Transaction monitoring review
Test whether alert scenarios, thresholds, and disposition quality catch the risks your products actually create.
Softengageai
Independent fieldwork from Kwun Tong—scoped for wallets, remittance, lending, and payment platforms that need evidence, not slide decks.
When a bank partner or internal committee asks whether your AML program works in practice, we test governance, CDD, monitoring, sanctions, and SAR escalation as they actually run.
Fieldwork samples cases, system configurations, and committee minutes. You receive an effectiveness opinion letter, a control heat map, and a remediation plan written for compliance committees—not only for security engineers.
Pair a full-program review with monitoring, CDD, or sanctions audits when a partner questionnaire is already in motion.
Test whether alert scenarios, thresholds, and disposition quality catch the risks your products actually create.
Assess onboarding, refresh, and enhanced due diligence practices for retail, SME, and institutional fintech customers.
Examine list sources, matching logic, false-positive handling, and escalation for customers, payees, and intermediaries.
Notes from MLROs and risk directors who needed shareable AML findings—not another internal workshop summary.
“Softengageai tested our monitoring dispositions the way a banking partner would—not the way our vendor demo suggested. The gap matrix gave product and compliance a shared backlog.”
“Their CDD file review exposed refresh failures we had papered over. We fixed the process before our next partner diligence cycle.”
“Remediation validation was tight and fast. Closed findings were re-tested and we returned a short letter our bank relationship team could file.”
We reply from Hong Kong within one business day with scope options and timing.
Start a conversation